讀後心得

A 29-year-old man from Maryland, Abreu, was mistakenly sent to a Salvadoran prison due to an error by immigration authorities. Federal Judge Yenis ruled that the Trump administration must bring him back to the United States. Although the immigration judge had ruled in 2019 that Abreu should not be deported, immigration authorities still made a mistake last month. The judge questioned the government's actions, and the lawyer admitted that Abreu should not have been deported but failed to explain the reasons. The lawyer stated that the government should be responsible for bringing him back, but has yet to do so, emphasizing that this is a matter of protecting human rights.

A 29-year-old man from Maryland was sent to a Salvadoran prison due to an "administrative error" by the immigration authorities. Federal district judge Verbena ruled on the 4th that the Trump administration must arrange for his return to the United States. As early as 2019, an immigration judge had determined that the man should not be deported to El Salvador, but the immigration authorities during the Trump administration made this mistake last month. Verbena asked Justice Department lawyer Juveni in court why the government made such an "illegal" decision, to which Juveni failed to provide a reasonable explanation, even admitting that the man should not have been deported and certainly should not have been sent back to El Salvador. He stated that he did not know the legal basis for the Immigration Enforcement Agency's arrest and expressed frustration over many issues. The judge inquired why the man was sent to what activists call "the place where human rights are most often violated," El Salvador. The lawyer replied, "I don't know; no one provided information on this." Juveni had requested the judge grant him 24 hours to see if the government could intervene to bring the man back, "giving the government another chance to get it right without court supervision." He said this was the advice given to the client but it has not yet been realized. The judge further asked why the U.S. government could not bring him back, to which Juveni candidly admitted, "When I took on this case, that was my first question, but I still have not received a satisfactory answer." The man's lawyer stated that the government had acknowledged the mistake but had not taken action to bring him back, which surprised him. "The White House has made so many tweets, held so many meetings, but there has been no action to request that the Salvadoran government return him." The lawyer emphasized that seeking compensation is not the main point; "this is merely about bringing the person back to the United States." Only when he returns home and is reunited with his family can it be considered a "judicial victory." He stated that while it is nice for the government to apologize, he does not have high expectations.